‘activism’

To Pitch or to Pee: Say What? Re-learning how to Speak “Documentary”

Language can be a confusing animal. Many, many words have different meanings in different contexts, and the definitions or specific uses are unique to the place you are in or the people you are speaking with. While this shows just how versatile and complex language is, it can also present a sizable barrier to communication.

Why are we talking about this here? Because it can become an issue within community organizing and activism, when we use words and shorthand within a group whose deeper meanings are not readily available to an outsider. This can alienate the very people we are trying to reach.

How these many nuances of language can play a role in documentary film-making is something that Fernanda Rossi explores in her article “Say What? Re-learning How to Speak ‘Documentary’”. Fernanda is a creative force in the documentary field, and was a big support to me while I was finishing “The Line.” Go ahead and give her wonderful article a read!

 

Badass Activist Friday presents: Audacia Ray

It’s Friday, and we all know what that means! Interviews with your favorite badass feminists and activists. Whether social media queens and kings, creative artists, sex educators, or just kick-ass personalities, these people harness righteous anger, instigate movements and inspire cultural change. We’re here to honor them and their work, but more importantly, to highlight how we can all get up, plug in, and Just Start Doing.

This week, the wonderful Audacia Ray agreed to speak with us about her work as an activist, writer and sex worker rights advocate. She was the author of Waking Vixen, a highly acclaimed sex blog that was active between 2004 and spring of this year, and is now running the Red Umbrella Project, which aims to make the authentic voices of sex workers heard. But let’s let her tell us about it herself. Here’s what she had to say to us:

On your blog, you describe yourself as a sex worker rights activist. How would you summarize your work, and how did you come to do it?

I work to amplify the voices of people who have experience in the sex industry, whether they arrive at that experience through choice, coercion, or circumstance. My main focus is cultural activism, creating spaces for sex workers to speak up in public forums and through various media production adventures. I started doing this work in 2004, when I was a sex worker and feeling isolated. I was seeking community and wanted to talk to other people who had similar experiences. I found the nascent $pread, a magazine by and for sex workers that was in the process of being launched, and I signed on. I became an editor and was involved with the magazine for about four years. A lot of my projects over the past few years have grown out of that experience.

In your work, you combine new media and outreach by taking advantage of several different mediums (podcasts and blogs, as well as in-person workshops). Why do you think it is important to reach people via these different venues? Do you think that this approach is tailored to your project, or are there ways in which activism in general could benefit from using different platforms?

I think the main thing that I’ve learned about the different mediums is that they are, well, different. When I started it was with the attitude of – I just need to get my stuff out there and then people will know about it! For an activist web project I did last year, I did an exercise of thinking up all the types of people who might come to the site, how they’d get there, and what they’d be looking for, and what we’d want them to take away. It’s a good exercise and definitely made it really clear that there is no “general public” – you have to get more precise than that.

The people who read blogs aren’t necessarily the folks who look for podcasts on iTunes or browse the video shows on Blip TV or hang out with their friends on Facebook. This is a good thing, but sometimes it means you need to make a choice and pick one or two ways to reach out instead of being everywhere all the time. Unless all you do is spend time on the internet – which is definitely where I was at a few years ago, but now I do a lot of work offline, as well, so I have to be more selective about my engagement. 

Your main project is the Red Umbrella Project. Can you tell us more about this project? What are you doing, where did the idea for this originate, and what do you hope to achieve?

The Red Umbrella Project reframes the public dialogue on the impact of stigma and discrimination on people who trade sex for the things they need, through the lens of lived experience. We provide training and support to people who wish to engage with media and in public forums to tell their stories about issues that affect them. The main programs are a media training intensive called Speak Up!, which is designed for sex workers to learn the trickery of the mainstream media, plus how to do messaging and interact with hostile/clueless journalists (sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between those). I also host a live monthly storytelling series, the Red Umbrella Diaries, which takes place on the first Thursday of the month at Happy Ending in NYCs Lower East Side, but we will be expanding to new cities in the coming year. We’ve also been doing a legislative training for the last few years for sex workers to learn to do advocacy in New York State, and have a few other programs that we’ll hopefully be rolling out in 2012.

You closed your blog WakingVixen earlier this year, after having been online with it since 2004. Can you explain your motivation for closing the blog? You’ve been a pioneer and in the vanguard of online community, advocacy and storytelling. How do you see the field changing? What excites you? What do you miss?What has it been like to move towards an increase in live events, and what motivated this decision?

My relationship to the internet -and of course, the internet itself- has evolved considerably since I started writing about my life on Blogger in 2004. I found that I kept intending to write long personal and/or analytical posts on my blog, but kept not getting around to it, and was instead hanging out on Twitter, reading group blogs, watching videos, and listening to podcasts. With media, you really have to adapt or die, and I felt like I was letting my blog crumble and die. So I killed it, and I adapted. Now I post short stuff on my Tumbler, I obsessively track my reading on Goodreads, I tweet, I host a podcast (search for Red Umbrella Diaries on iTunes) and occasionally produce and post videos. Lately I’ve been doing a lot more listening and learning online instead of always pushing out new stuff. It’s definitely as important to listen as it is to talk.

What’s been on your mind lately? Have you been reading a new blog? Discovered an awesome book? Or is there a news story that really inspired you? Please share with us!

I’ve been thinking a lot about the long-term effects of being committed to doing activism in a deep way, and the ways it’s worn me down over the years. I am coming to appreciate self care and down time more than I allowed myself to several years ago. And I’ve also come to realize that activist work is about taking steps forward and steps back, and that’s the fight. Over a short period of time, it seems like nothing changes, but over the years, there is a shift. When I first started doing activism, I felt like we were just on the cusp of radical change. I don’t feel that way anymore, and I feel a little sad that I’ve lost that. But at the same time, I think I’ve gotten a bigger appreciation for the work that goes into making change, shifting culture. And I’m in it, I’m signed up. It’s just interesting to have my vantage point shift in that way.

 

Thank you so much for those wonderful, thoughtful answers, Audacia!

 

 

Badass Activist Friday presents: Akiba Solomon

It’s Friday, and we all know what that means! Interviews with your favorite badass feminists and activists. Whether social media queens and kings, creative artists, sex educators, or just kick-ass personalities, these people harness righteous anger, instigate movements and inspire cultural change. We’re here to honor them and their work, but more importantly, to highlight how we can all get up, plug in, and Just Start Doing.

This week, we spoke with Akiba Solomon. Akiba is an author, editor and freelance journalist. Aside from her regular column at Colorlines.com, she has also written for a variety of publications, such as Glamour and Redbook.

Can you tell us a little bit about how you view your position at Colorlines? Who would you like to reach and what would you like them to take away from your posts? Have you experienced any support or resistance for the subjects you tackle in a way that surprised you?

I’m the gender columnist at Colorlines.com, which means I cover news, culture, health and politics relevant to the intersection between race and gender. It’s a very broad beat, and I tend to feel overwhelmed if I consciously target any reader. So I concentrate on writing with sensitivity, clarity and accuracy and hope people understand my points and intention. I want people who read my work to come away with enough information to formulate their own opinion. If they agree and feel validated, that’s a bonus for me. But if they disagree that’s fine, too.

You presented a side of the Texas gang rape case that was otherwise not talked about very widely. Why do you think the mainstream media mishandled the reporting so badly?

I don’t think all mainstream media did a poor job. The Houston Chronicle’s Cindy Horswell did a hell of a job reporting and writing about this case.

I think overall the problem with the coverage, however, was a lack of depth. If national media outlets didn’t want to devote real resources to this story, they should have left it alone. (I’m thinking of The New York Times here.)

You can’t just drop a straight news reporter into a town as small and interconnected as Cleveland, have him quote a few people who are trying to protect their friends and family members from life sentences and expect to get a story that doesn’t blame the victim. And if an overwhelming number of townspeople truly do blame an 11-year-old child for a gang rape, THAT’S your story.

Your focus can’t be, “How is the town reacting?” It should be, “How was gang rape [aka "running a train'] normalized to the extent that so many boys and men participated in it and recorded themselves doing it?” Or, “Even if the participants believed that what they were doing was consensual and legal, why would it ever be OK for middle school boys and young adult males in their mid-20s to participate in the same sexual activity?” Or, “Why do people keep asking where her mother was – or where the boys’ mothers were? What does that say about how we view male culpability?” Or, “What role did race play in dehumanizing this victim and her attackers?”

I guess what I’m saying is that this wasn’t a straight reporting job but it was treated as such. Unless you devote resources, time and care to a story like this, and you truly search for the story behind the story, it’s too tempting for most reporters to coast on the most basic narrative. In the case of rape, the narrative pivots on the behavior, attire, sexual history, appearance, immediate reaction, recall, race, class and alleged motives of the female victim. In this economy, and with the erosion of even basic journalistic practices, this is going to get worse.

You’ve written quite extensively on the DSK case and advocated for Nafissatou Diallo. Can you summarize the lessons we can learn from this case about the kind of culture that we live in? What makes it especially difficult for survivors, especially women of color, low-income and/or foreign born women to talk about their experiences?

Hmm. This is really difficult to summarize. I would say that if an accuser is female, poor and of color, we live in a culture that will scrutinize her more than the rich white male who has allegedly raped her. This case says that rich, powerful white males are at greater risk of false accusations than poor, powerless women of color are of being raped. If something goes wrong, it’s the woman’s fault, because she’s greedy, a liar, a prostitute or a pawn in a political entrapment plot.

I would say that many, many people think rape is about sexual temptation and desire rather than power and violence. That’s how you get seasoned writers commenting on the appearance of the accuser, and readers posting about how “ugly” she is.

I think low-income women of color, particularly immigrants, are so vulnerable because they often lack of job security, they fear deportation and they know that law enforcement criminalizes them. If you know you’re going to be scrutinized and you already feel confused, ashamed, terrified and humiliated by the rape, why would you bother?

It’s almost safer to stay quiet.

You have voiced some ambivalence about the recent SlutWalk movement. Can you explain your feelings on the movement? Do you have any thoughts on how something like the SlutWalk could be more inclusive and truly intersectional?

I’m happy that so many people have found a way to address sexual assault victim-blaming and assert their personal power. Anything that empowers folks – particularly people who have been victimized in this way – is positive. I don’t condemn the early marches for not being “more inclusive” or “intersectional”. They were organized through social networks. If the organizers don’t have broad, diverse social networks, their march is going to reflect that. That said, this isn’t a movement I would participate in. It doesn’t speak to me. I know from the “n-word” debate that trying to appropriate dehumanizing, dangerous language doesn’t make it less powerful or insulting; just more common.

Do you have any projects you are currently working on that you would like to talk about here? Or is there anything going on in the media/pop culture/the blogosphere that’s on your mind a lot recently?

I have a book I co-edited about Black women and body image called “Naked: Black Women Bare All About Their Skin, Hair, Lips and Other Parts”. It was published right before the huge social networking explosion and has since lapsed from printing. My co-editor and I are working on ways to get this book and message back out there because it’s very relevant. As for the blogosphere: my constant struggle is with information overload. What’s been on my mind is how to sift through the political gamesmanship and the crazy that the presidential election is going to spark. It’s already a big racist mess and it’s going to get worse.

 

Thank you for your time and your candid answers, Akiba!


 



There’s a rapist on the loose, but should I call the cops?

I’ve lived in New York City since 1993, on 4th avenue before it was called Park Slope, Red Hook before IKEA and lobster rolls, and after 18 years of nomadic renting, I became a homeowner in Sunset Park. My partner and I moved to Sunset Park for the beautiful views, the diversity of residents, the family-friendly atmosphere and the delicious food. I didn’t move to Sunset Park because I thought it was “safe,” but I really appreciated walking home late at night without looking over my shoulder.

Right now, there’s a real and present danger going on in our neighborhoods. There is a rapist attacking women along 4th avenue in Sunset Park, on 16th street in Park Slope, and in Bay Ridge. He is on his 5th attack since March. These are incidences of rape and attempted rape where calling the police for help would be the logical thing to do.

Statistics show that 85% of women who are raped, are raped by people they know. The “stranger on a dark street” is a stereotype, and the minority of our experiences. But when strangers do attack, they rape in Williamsburg apartment vestibules, on late-night subway platforms, at a Chelsea nightclub, or by the Dunkin Donuts on 4th avenue. I’m a rape survivor, and although I was raped by someone I know, it’s hard for me to truly feel safe anywhere. I take my experience of rape wherever I go. I’m keenly aware of my vulnerability on the dark stretches of 5th avenue by Greenwood Cemetery just after I miss the B63 bus, or the shadowy and loud walkway under the Prospect Expressway when I come home on the F train. I’m vulnerable in these instances not because I’m “a victim”, but because I am a woman, and there’s a predator who is actively looking for women like me.

Grappling with feelings of vulnerability, I turned this experience into action, and created The Line Campaign, an organization focused on violence prevention through multimedia education.  We make films and use social media that teach young people to recognize and prevent sexual assault, working to stop violence before it happens. My work empowers young people to navigate their sexuality through choice and consent, while challenging myths about rape. Rarely in my work do I talk about involving the police or the criminal justice system, because we know that the criminal justice system is skewed unfairly against sexual assault victims.

Right now, we need the police, but after the events this summer, I don’t trust the NYPD. Kenneth Moreno, Franklin Mata and Michael Pena, three NYPD officers charged with rape while in uniform, have made our streets less safe for women. What they have shown us by their actions, is that we women cannot expect protection if we need it. These officers collected salaries and pensions, swore to serve the community, but they raped us instead.

NYPD – what can you do? Educate your officers about sexual assault, make the education effective, mandatory and often. Meet with survivors, activists and allies; we will help you get educated. Make sure your officers have empathy, and weed potential perpetrators out of your ranks. The majority of police officers follow the rules, identify the ones who don’t and get ride of them. Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Kelly: protect the citizens of South Brooklyn, beef up police presence in our neighborhood, but only if you are preventing violence within your ranks.

What can we do? Neighbors, we need to be vigilant and look out for each other. Make signs alerting the neighborhood to recent attacks, make eye contact, talk to each other. Local businesses need to be allies, post our signs, talk to your patrons, make sure they have a way to get home, offer information about car services and bus schedules. If someone calls for help, come to his or her assistance. We have learned from Kitty Genovese, and we will not be passive bystanders. As a community, we can actively participate in making streets safer for women, and we can take rape seriously.

There are two events scheduled for September 14th:
NOW-NYC: She Asked For It, How Rape Myths Hurt Us All 6:30pm
Take Back Our Streets by Safe-Slope March at 17th St./4th Ave 8:30pm

Sign petition demanding increased police presence:
Increase police presence in South Brooklyn

Join the Safe Slope Community
Stay up to date with @thelinecampaign

 

Badass Activist Friday Presents: David Zhou and Vivian Lu

It’s Friday, and we all know what that means! Interviews with your favorite badass feminists and activists. Whether social media queens and kings, creative artists, sex educators, or just kick-ass personalities, these people harness righteous anger, instigate movements and inspire cultural change. We’re here to honor them and their work, but more importantly, to highlight how we can all get up, plug in, and Just Start Doing.

This week, I spoke with David Zhou and Vivia Lu, who are the founders of Microaggressions, a user-generated Tumblr blog that let’s people talk about their experiences with microaggressions.

Let’s talk about Microaggressions. Can you describe how the site works and what it does?

David:
Currently, Microaggressions is an interactive submissions-based project. Each post includes a short contextualization and the psychological impact on the person. We have a handful of editors who help us select and edit each post to provide a collage of events that depict the volume of daily disempowerment endured over time by people who identify with oppressed social identities.

Ultimately, we are trying to show connections between daily personal experience and larger, systemic and institutional injustices in society. We are also trying to show intersectional experience between various social identities, particularly race, socioeconomic class, gender, sexuality, religion, body issues. At the same time, the project is not about showing how ignorant people can be in an effort to demonize them. It’s really about showing how their actions can create and enforce unsafe spaces that have larger social effects. We are hoping to publish a parallel blog that provides in-depth long-form analysis of the issues at stake.

How did you get the idea to start Microaggressions? Was there a
particular event that sparked the idea, or was it more of a gradual process?

Vivian:
David and I ranted to each other during an otherwise lethargic class about microaggressive experiences from our lives. Eventually we started a meticulous record of microaggressions that have happened or are happening to us. This was somewhat in response to an incident on campus at the time where a student government party running for office had plastered campus with flyers reading, “Two Asian Girls at the same time,” which really upset some of our friends who saw that it evoked pornographic fetishization of Asian women and lesbians, while others completely denied that it was inappropriate in any way. (We’ve written about this experience, and will post an essay soon on the site about it.)

This was our middle ground and answer of sorts, where we wanted to show that some of our friends’ anger was coming from a lifetime of similar microaggressions that relate to larger histories and systemic injustice. We began with incidents that we remembered from our own lives where gender, race (we are both Asian American), class, and sexuality hierarchies were enforced by people around us, beginning with elementary school teachers, family, and peers. Originally entitled “Notes on Everyday Life,” this document eventually became the first posts of our blog when we decided to share it online and ask our peers for their experiences. While we had the idea during college, we brought the idea to life several months later when we had time to look for the online platforms and services that could facilitate our project. Once we had it up, we emailed about 40 friends, and the site took off from there with the help of social networks.

What has it been like being the founders of such a relatively well-known project? Have you made any connections with other activists, and with contributors to your site?

David:
It’s been really exciting and challenging. We get questions, feedback, requests, and critiques every day that expand our thinking about allied and intersectional activism. It’s also been wonderful to meet other folks doing similar work and talking about how we can collaborate. We’ve involved people we’ve only met online into the project – for comment moderation and the upcoming site redesign, for example.

We’d like to take some of the project offline – into print media and conferences – in order to engage audiences who might not be connected to the social justice blogosphere. We really appreciate when people reach out to us!

Have there been any contributions that particularly touched you?

Vivian:
The fact that people submit and spend their time contributing to the project with experiences from settings as mundane as work and intimate as family is really touching to me. David and I would have long fizzled out if we were just posting our own experiences. Most recently, I really appreciated that we recently were contacted by a concerned individual to create a separate trans* tag, and have since received a lot of trans microaggressive experiences to post.

We have a little number on all of our posts that count how many times people have reblogged/liked it, and while the numbers vary drastically from post to post, I really appreciate the ones that don’t get liked/reblogged as much. They’re usually a much more subtle or “everyday” submission, and less particularly shocking/immediately WTF bloggable, which really represents the bulk of microaggressions that really wear people down in their day to day lives.

What experiences have you yourself had with such microaggressions, and how do you deal with them when they come up?

Vivian:
In a way, our upbringings were primed with experiences that have opened our eyes to these invisible oppressive actions.

I grew up in Colorado and began thinking critically about race, gender, class, religion, and sexuality mostly when I moved to NYC for college. I was initially shocked at the visibility of racial segregation of NYC neighborhoods – even simply taking the 7 train to Queens and slowly watching all the white people get off. I was also initially shocked at street harassment I received that was intensely racialized and gendered. This opened the door for me to question a lot more about the ways in which social identities impact individual lives. It was a heartbreaking and devastating process, where I re-learned American history not taught in public grade schools and re-remembered my own childhood experiences and realized the different ways in which social identities I hold affected how people treated me and my family. Because so many of these microaggressions had happened so long ago, the only way to record and recognize them was for me to write them down. For microaggressions now, it depends on the safety and comfortability of the situation, as many of our submitters explain. Most of the time, I don’t call microaggressions out. Sometimes, I’m so bored and numb from unoriginality (Where are you really from? / That’s an interesting major for you.) that I give up.

David attended a private high school in NYC of extreme class privilege, where he witnessed a lot of blatant oppressions along race, gender and class. Growing up in those environments caused us to meet in student organizing circles during college, where we saw even more microaggressive actions by the nature of our work.

What do you both do aside from running Microaggressions? What are some other projects you are working on?

David:
Besides the blog, there’s a lot that we’d like to do with the project. Right now, we’re in the middle of a site redesign that will eventually enable us to launch a parallel blog on the site with in-depth analysis of systemic injustice through personal memoirs/creative writing, essays, and artwork. The redesign will also allow us to integrate better search options and technical features. In addition to the redesign, we are also working on releasing print materials for education about various issues related to microaggressions, for which we’ve gotten many requests. These materials can hopefully be used in classrooms, workplace trainings, diversity workshops, etc. to provide an engaging, interactive way to teach issues of privilege and power.

As for ourselves personally, we aren’t “full-time activists or organizers.” Vivian spent this last year working as family shelter staff at a NYC domestic violence organization, and I taught in Korea. We are both starting graduate school this year – Vivian in sociocultural anthropology and I in computational biology.

While we’re not professional organizers, we believe that our politics are full-time. Anyone can be part of this project if they have experiences to share and the time to listen and reflect.

 

Thanks for taking the time to share your answers with us!

Badass Activist Friday presents: Cory Silverberg

It’s Friday, and we all know what that means! Interviews with your favorite badass feminists and activists. Whether social media queens and kings, creative artists, sex educators, or just kick-ass personalities, these people harness righteous anger, instigate movements and inspire cultural change. We’re here to honor them and their work, but more importantly, to higlight how we can all get up, plug in, and Just Start Doing.

Today’s Badass activist is Cory Silverberg. Cory is a certified sexuality educator, researcher and author, and he is the sexuality guide at About.com. He also serves on the board of ISIS, is the co-author of The Ultimate Guide to Sex and Disability and conducts workshops on various topics surrounding sex.

I actually had the pleasure of meeting Cory in person at last spring’s Sex::Tech conference in San Francisco, and I can personally attest to the fact that he’s super awesome, and I’m excited that he agreed to do this interview with us. Here’s what he had to say:

You’re the “sexuality guide” at About.com. That’s pretty broad as far as job definitions go. How do you choose what topics to write about? Do you cover recent news events? Go where reader questions take you? Indulge your own curiosity?

It’s definitely all of the above. There are two main kinds of writing I do for About.com. What they call long form articles which mostly come from my curiosity and reader questions (and which, it should be said, aren’t actually very long), and blogging. Blogs are obviously even shorter, and those are almost always tied to something timely or from the news. One of the most amazing parts of my job with About.com is the editorial freedom they give me within my topic area which is just about as broad as you can get. I can write anything related to sexuality, which means in one week I might b reading research on erectile dysfunction, preparing for a 17-part series, while also reading a galley copy of African Sexualities: A Reader both for my own education and the possibility of reviewing it, and at the same time scanning news, and god help me, entertainment media for pop culture stories related to sexuality. I do all this while also reading a lot of what other people are writing online about sex, which is another source of inspiration. In terms of what gets published, I try to balance my writing so that readers who come to the site aren’t exposed to only one way of thinking about sex.  So some of my articles respond to the pervasive medical modern approach to sexuality, other writing is more grounded in identity or social justice frameworks. And the best of it is a mix.

You’ve co-authored a book called The Ultimate Guide to Sex and Disability. How did you come to write that book? What do you think we can all learn from viewing sex through different lenses?

So as I think you know, I’m currently non-disabled, and the work I do around disability I usually do as an ally (although apropos of multiple lenses, I also come to the topic as a friend, partner, and family member). As someone who doesn’t have lived experience of disability it’s obviously very important to be mindful of how my voice may be, or may even appear to be, speaking for others, particularly others who tend to be silenced in conversations about sex. I wanted to say this because while I love thinking about different lenses we use to understand things through, I find myself talking about the lens of access more than the lens of disability, just to be really clear about what I’m representing and what I’m not. This stuff is so fraught, so I don’t mean to suggest there’s one way of doing this or talking about this. But I feel it’s important to at least try and explain how I do things, if I expect others to share how they do things with me.

The question about what we can all learn from anything is such a big one that I don’t think I’m really able to answer it briefly. For me, thinking about access – whether I’m writing or teaching or trying to have sex – means throwing out most of what I learned growing up and starting by considering some basic questions about bodies and desire. To think about access in something other than a token way requires us to challenge identity politics and to challenge our own experiences of both privelege and marginalization. Ultimately if my goal is to engage in pleasurable/entertaining/educational/meaningful exchanges with other people, access is the way to get there. I’m not sure if any of that makes sense. But I can also share that I find almost all mainstream, so-called comprehensive, sex education to be painfully exclusionary of both people with a wide range of experience of disability and also those of us for whom Disability and Deafness (both with intentional capital D’s) are a part of our lives.

About.com is an online service, but you also conduct in-person training for sex educators. What are some of the differences in your approach when it comes to online vs. in-person work?

In my experience, there’s no comparison when it comes to working online vs working in person. The experiences are fundamentally different. Being with people physically and being with people virtually can be equally powerful, painful, fun sexy, wierd, interesting, etc … But they sure aren’t the same experiences. But I wouldn’t say one is better than the other. I love doing bot. While they are different experiences as an educator I’m not sure my approach changes much.

In all my work the challenge for me is to offer people something substantial and meaningful, without requiring to define themselves any more than they want to I don’t think any of us should have to choose a gender, or orientation, or desire, or value in order to get support in thinking through our questions and experiences of sexuality. This is usually expected of course, “If I want the advice-columnist-sex-expert-vlogger to answer my question, I’m going to have to say my problem is X, and my experience is Y”. Dealing in absolutes is a trade off many make either out of necessity or because they happen to think in absolutes themselves. And it’s what allows a lot of people to say something coherent about sex in 400 words. I appreciate these kinds of exchanges but they don’t work for me. I don’t think that way, I don’t feel that way, and as a result there’s nothing I find interesting or satisfying about interacting with people in such an all-or-nothing way. That’s equally true online or in person. So I end up having to communicate differently in person vs. online, but the differences are more about techique than approach.

How do you feel, in general, that technology and the internet have impacted sexuality? I was born in the mid-80s, and I can barely remember not being online. The first thing I did when I started to question my sexuality was to go on Yahoo and search the topic, and I don’t know what I would have done if I had not been able to find support from the safety of my own room. At the same time, these developments in technology have also brought us  the “sexting-panic” and relationships started and conducted entirely on Facebook, and there is more misinformation about sex on the internet than you can shake a stick at. So is it a mixed bag, or do you view it as an overall positive development?

I’d argue that technology is neutral. Of course it’s impact on our lives is anything but neutral. But computation technologies (whether we’re talking about mobile social networking, teledildonics or texting) cannot, I would argue, reasonably be said to be “good” or “bad”. I wouldn’t say this is true for all technology of course, but with most sex technologies I believe it is. I can’t spend too much time focusing on individual sex panics as a problem of a particular technology because there have been sex panics tied to technology probably since humans figured out how to produce fire (the stoneage headline read “Invention of Fire Brings More Outdoor Sex, Communities Scandalized”).

But there are plenty of questions I’m interested in around sex and technology. I’m interested in thinking about how new technologies are being developed and whether or not they are being developed in ways that will increase or decrease our access to sexual expression and exploration. Technology may be neutral, but the people who make it aren’t. So I wonder about how capitalism, the system within which all computational technologies are developed, inserts itself in our sexual options and our access to basic sexual rights. I’m also interested in thinking about how sexuality professionals can play a role in the development of new technologies.

Are you working on anything specific right now? Have a project you are excited about or an issue that’s on your mind a lot? Please share it with us!

Yes! I’ve actually got two things I’m working on that I’m extra excited about. The first is called the Sexuality and Access Project. The purpose of the project is to facilitate more discussion of issues around sexuality and disability particularly in the context of attendant services (sometimes also called personal support work). The project began with a survey of over 400 people who use attendant services and people who provide attendant services about the many ways that sexuality intersects with using and providing what some people refer to as attendant care. From that we developed some amazing documentary video tools and are doing our first trainings in September. If people are interested they can find out more on our Facebook page, or they can always send us an email at sexuality.access@gmail.com

The other project is a book for kids about sex.  Actually it’s a series of books. The first is written and I’m just trying to figure out whether to try and work with a publisher or publish it myself. I have so many friends who are now having kids and who want books that reflect their lives and experience, so I started by writing a book for the son of a friend of mine, and then I started reading it to other kids and it was both fun and challenging. It’s been a long time since I did something that I then had to go out and tell lots of people about, so I’m having mixed feelings about how to put something out in the world in a way that takes up some space, but still feels ethical and doesn’t scare me too much. But I’m committed to doing something with it in 2012.

 

Thank you for your time and your wonderful answers, Cory!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


Badass Activist Friday presents: Marilla Li

It’s Friday, and we all know what that means! Interviews with your favorite badass feminists and activists. Whether social media queens and kings, creative artists, sex educators, or just kick-ass personalities, these people harness righteous anger, instigate movements and inspire cultural change. We’re here to honor them and their work, but more importantly, to higlight how e can all get up, plug in, and Just Start Doing.

We are particularly proud to present today’s activist, as she is one of our own: Marilla Li is a former intern for the Line Campaign and she is still on of the regular contributors to our blog.

Currently Marilla works as the Youth Services Coordinator at the Charles B. Wang Community Health Center in New York City.

Let’s hear what she has to say!

In your first post on the blog, you talked about some of the labels that you use for yourself and how you feel about them. How would you describe yourself now? Where are you now on your journey as a feminist/activist? And can you tell us a little bit about where you started out from?

First, let me acknowledge how honored I feel to be featured in the Badass Activist Friday series. I was reading through the list of past interview subjects – Heather Corinna, Andrea Plaid, Sady Doyle – and had a very dramatic feminist geek-out moment that, sadly, no one else witnessed.

Anyway. When I wrote that post in January 2010, I was in a very different place. I was graduating from Barnard College, wrapping up my senior thesis project, starting an internship at The Line Campaign, and participating in multiple student campaigns all at once. Everything was gaining traction and I felt like part of a major movement for change. I equated this movement to feminism and activism and, in the process, mistakenly laid down some assumptions about them.

I’ve been out of college for over a year now. These assumptions about feminism and activism no longer fit into my current surroundings. When I argue with people now about social injustice, in their eyes I am not being a feminist or an activist, but rather “radical”, “critical”, “angry”, or simply “difficult”. In this sense, Barnard sheltered me and my peers. It made an institutional choice to flaunt feminism and activism, throwing the term around freely on signs and posters, in texts and syllabi. It felt ubiquitous, secure and all-encompassing. Beyond college, however, feminism and activism feels like identifiers that need to be actively maintained.

My partner described my current state succinctly. He said, “You are a feminist and activist because you make these things a lifestyle. You never change the lens through which you view things.” To me, feminism is the desire to be treated as a person, an entire being, rather htan just a woman, and activism is the effort I take toward making this desire a reality. That said, feminism and activism make up a lifestyle that runs the risk of being very insular and alienating.

My feelings about my own labels have shifted a lot in a year. Instead of just being frustrated by people who don’t understand these labels, I step back, let the frustration pass, and focus on what to do in order to educate and empower those people. If I could talk to the person who wrote that blog entry a year ago, I would say, “You are right. Your peers are overthinking themselves into an identity-based paralysis. That’s frustrating. You’re smart. You’re proud. You’re fierce. But you’re also naive. You’re impulsive. You aren’t doing enough to empower the people who don’t have the same intellectual vocabulary you do. They haven’t been given the tools to build their identity the way you have. What are you going to do about it?”

You work at a community health center, where you program events to improve the health literacy of the Chinese immigrant population. How did you find your way into this job?

That’s an interesting story. For my senior thesis project, I researched the many ways that pharmaceutical marketing shapes (and is shaped by) different women’s attitudes toward oral contraception. My major was Anthropology, so part of my thesis required fieldwork. I spoke with my college’s health services staff for research. They referred me to the Charles B. Want Community Health Center, which is a non-profit, federally qualified health center. There, I met the Director of the Women’s Health Department. We only had one interview for my thesis, but that conversation blew me away. She told me about the community of undocumented Chinese immigrant women whose lives I had never touched, whose perspectives I had never once considered. She told me, ” Before these women came to the U.S., they lived under a one child policy, and were required to use long-term birth control methods like the IUD. What should they care about how the pill is marketed? The advertisements aren’t even written in a language that they understand.”

I remember being very shook by this initial conversation with this Director. I started thinking very hard about my own ignorance to the communities that exist under the radar. I couldn’t stop thinking about it. After my project ended, I emailed the Director of Women’s Health and said, “Here’s my resume. I want to work here. I don’t care what job you have available. Just give me something.” Bad career development tactic aside, I remember feeling at the time that if I didn’t start working at the health center, I wouldn’t be giving back and therefore wouldn’t be fulfilling my personal definition of activism.

How was your former position (working in women’s health) different from your current position (teen health)? How has the demographic you are addressing influenced your approach?

Without getting into too much detail, I will briefly explain that my transition from the former field to the latter was unplanned. I attribute the decision largely to someone upstairs, due to a combination of the federal budget cuts, hiring freezes, and poor management decisions. Sound familiar?

One significant difference between the women an the teens I serve is their set of priorities. Chinese immigrant women are unique in that they work long erratic hours, watch children and keep their families afloat (in the city and across the country) all at once. Women like these are machines of efficiency. At the health center, they arrive on time, register, hear a ten minute health education session, get the doctor’s advice, grab a prescription, and run. The teens, on the other hand, have to get dragged to the health center. They are much more preoccupied with fitting into their pre-existing social circles, with friends and at school. They are much less willing to come into the health center. In teen health, programcs have to reach youth in settings that they already know, which is why the Pediatric Unit implements more alternative activities in sports or in the arts. I’ve only worked at this unit for a moth, but I’ve seen Pediatrics program more interesting events – open mic talent shows, basketball clinics, public theater groups – than Women’s health would in a year.

Also, another significant difference is that I used to think that the women I served always felt stigma towards discussing health. When I speak to some of these women privately, however, they share some of the most amazing stories. For example, I once accompanied a pregnant patient on a hospital tour. While we waited, she shared that she had only been in the U.S. for a month, there was no one to support her through the pregnancy, and she was facing immigration problems because someone screwed up her medical records. “I don’t know who can help me,” she said. “If I don’t get a visa in the U.S., I’ll get deported after the baby is born, and the baby will have no one.” I wish I had more space to share more stories like these, but the reality is that every patient I meet has one. I’ve had a much harder time trying to build this kind of trust with youth, especially in a clinical setting such as at the health center. With that said, once I know the story, it’s usually just as compelling a story as the women’s. Building trust is always important and it is usually the first thing I try to do with individuals.

You conduct many of your workshops in Mandarin Chinese. Does this add another dimension to the work you are doing? How do you feel that your heritage influences your feminism, and vice versa?

This is a really hard question. It makes me feel obligated to explain the history of my learning Chinese as a second language. So I was born and raised in Ohio and later New York, but also spent some years studying and going to school in Beijing. Because of that education, my spoken Mandarin has no accent, but I can’t tell you how many times I have begun workshops or health education sessions and felt immediately categorized as “other” due to unspoken cultural markers. Most of my coworkers who aren’t from the U.S. call it a difference in “attitude” or “sensibility”. According to them and others I’ve asked, these discrete “attitudes” and “sensibilities” are discernible in subtle gestures such as a greeting or a facial twitch.

I think that anyone who is multilingual or who has studied linguistics understands and agrees that language is very wrapped up in cultural values. I read an ethnography detailing a society that considered cows to be a crucial element. The ethnographer realized the significance of this when he realized that the society had a million words to describe the cows by size, shape, color, hoof size, and so on. I haven’t done a lot of research ( anyone who knows otherwise, please correct me): but I don’t think that the concept of feminism exists in the Chinese language. If it does, it isn’t commonly used. I never once learned how to say “feminism” in Mandarin Chinese, at home or at work. I don’t know what this means. Is it substituted instead by “women’s rights” or “empowerment”?

This goes back to what I said before about recognizing one’s own privileges and ignorance, particularly the ignorance that comes from being unaware of one’s own intellectual vocabulary and identity-building tools. I’ve been trying to draw something productive out of recognizing these things. The fact that my job requires me to engage in a different set of cultural values certainly adds another dimension to who I am as a feminist and an activist. If feminism and activism are about communicating the concept of equality, then working with populations that faces so many communicative barriers inevitably calls those forms into question.

This isn’t a complication so much as an interesting challenge to one’s ability to communicate creatively. In order to reach people like those I work with now, I need to rely on more than spoken or written words. I also need to rely on emotional and visual markers to get my message across. Perhaps this is why media is such a powerful tool. It uses the visual to cut across very difficult barriers, such as culture or language, and creates emotional resonance with people who might otherwise live in isolation and estrangement.

Are you involved in any other projects that you’d like to tell us about? Particularly excited about a blog/movie/article/etc? Particularly upset about something going on in the world today? Please share!

I just listened to the 200th episode of WTF with Marc Maron, which is a really great podcast done by a very neurotic comic. I feel so connected to his podcast, which is both a validation and exacerbation of my own neuroticism.

Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services accepted new guidelines from the Institute of Medicine that will dramatically improve women’s health services.

Next month, a group of friends, some new and some old, and I will be submitting a zine on Asian women’s bodies to the Baltimore Zinefest.

Also, after submitting this entry, instead of watching preseason football, I plan to Google women’s rights groups in China as well as the Chinese word for “feminism”.

I remain excited about all these things.

 

Thank you for your time and your wonderful answers, Marilla!

SlutWalk Tucson

In April of 2011, I stumbled upon a surplus of powerful images of beautiful women bearing signs. The signs demanded the naive to see that rape is caused by rapists- not by a perceived sexy appearance, not by how much one has had to drink, not by sexual orientation, not by where one is located or the time of day. The signs demanded abolition of misogyny. The movement moved me.

Tucson is a relatively liberal city in Arizona. Friday, May 13th 2011 at 5pm an estimated 150 women and men gathered in front of the Tucson Police Department for SlutWalk Tucson. I had been anticipating that day from the moment I saw those images. I had promoted the event, the message behind it, begging everyone I knew to attend.  I arrived there late with a group of friends, disappointed due to how I was originally planning to be there alone and early.

We walked just a bit behind. About five minutes into it, I received a phone call from a close friend in New York. She was crying. She told me a story. A girl had been openly raped at a party, and no one did anything about it. My friend was left in shock, utterly disgusted at her city, at a loss of hope when her peers told her “it wasn’t their place to say anything.” Despite what they said, she approached the girl, telling her she felt for her. The girl raged at her and pushed her. Was it that no one wanted to do anything about it? Did they not know what to do about it?

My friend did not know where I was, but as I was walking, it’s was as if I belly-flopped into a hot, steamy reality. I was incredulous, but suddenly I understood exactly what we were all doing here.

This is for us.

We are human and this is us being human.

I was angry. As the phone call ended, I arrived at the main library to find the participants gathering to tell stories over the megaphone. The group was small, and in my state of disbelief, I was sickened with my city for the event not being larger. It made no sense to me not to be here. I gathered myself and stood at the front with strangers, watching them cheer, marveling at their bravery as they told their stories.

This is for us.

We are human and this is us being human.To say we would ever ask to be raped is completely illogical! Awful! What are our morals anymore? This was for us. We must gather ourselves. Now we know where we stand, and now we figure out how to expand. SlutWalk Tucson opened us up, and now we can see we must keep moving together.

After SlutWalk Tucson, I attended the follow up meeting. With help from HollaBack! Tucson now has Safe Streets AZ and just recently we began Nightlife Safety Project Tucson. The programs are both very young still, but with no doubt subject to grow. The movement moved Tucson.

 

The Line Campaign is looking for Bloggers and Interns!

5809957278_9a7f29232e_o

Where is your line?

INTERNS:
Are you a student interested in empowering young leaders to end sexual violence through film, social media and education?  We are looking for a talented and motivated INTERN to work in close partnership with filmmaker and activist, Nancy Schwartzman and team to learn how to make a film make social change in the world. This Intern will be vital in helping us building our campaign outreach and programs.

Email us for a full description, and please include your resume and references: thelinemovie @ gmail. com

BLOGGERS:
Are you passionate about sexual health, sex education, equality and talking about consent? Do you have stories you’d like to share with our community? Opinions on politics, current events and the media that you’d like to voice? We’d love to hear you!

If you would like to contribute to the blog, and are dedicated and able to write for us on a schedule, please send us an email at thelinemovie @ gmail. com and tell us a little bit about yourself.

We look forward to hearing from you!

The Line Needs YOU: seeking MANAGING EDITOR for WIYL blog.

I’ve been working here at the Line for some time now, but I’ve really only recently been struck hard by the fact that, well, The Line Campaign is important. With every screening we do, and every person we touch, we open the floor to new voices, opinions and increments of effort towards winning the fight. And when I say ‘the fight’ I don’t just mean an end to violence against women, but ending preconceptions about sex, desire and relationships – because things just aren’t that simple. This is is a forum to complicate, a channel to different points of view.

A few weeks ago, I read about the Long Island murders, and it was written that someone said – ‘when a reporter asked, ‘What can sex workers do to prevent violence?’ I said, ‘Well, maybe people could not kill us.” I cried because she told a story about a feeling that I felt too. I realised then that I joined The Line as an intern last year not just because I wanted to share my story, but because I wanted to help others tell theirs. When Latoya Peterson in her interview talked about bringing feminism to different, other worlds, it rang true for me, but this certainly wasn’t the case for others. That kind of difference is what makes this place unique – Nancy’s commitment to storytelling rings true and has been the reason such a diversity of voices have an opportunity to contribute to better understanding how and why we should care about these issues – whether reproductive justice, street harassment or sexual assault. That’s what this blog is for, a space where each person’s words, however arranged, matter. It’s important that it continue.

I’ve learned so much and had so much fun as managing editor of the WIYL blog over the past couple of months! Unfortunately, as I move on to graduate school, and begin pursuing other projects in community building in the literary arts, I’ll have a limited amount of time – and have had to make the sad decision to leave my post here.

And so, we’re looking for our next managing editor – someone invested in listening to stories and making sure they get them out there for others to read! We’re looking for you to become a leader in this community, to rally passion, relate it to our message, and foster always, more conversation in social media.

Responsibilities will include:

- managing a team of bloggers and creating their schedule

- finding news stories and relevant events to suggest to bloggers for coverage

- working to ensure a steady flow of content, on schedule

- editing and copyediting posts before publication

- researching news sources and ensuring you stay on top of current events

- keeping everyone excited and ‘on message’

Qualifications:

- enthusiasm, patience and creativity

- familiarity with wordpress and social media (twitter, facebook, myspace, tumblr)

- an open mind to all kinds of stories, opinions and experiences

- ability to juggle multiple tasks under deadline

- ability to communicate clearly and effectively, both verbally and in writing

- ability to work independently and with minimal supervision

- comfortable working on outreach to guest bloggers

- passionate, dedicated, and hoping to have fun

I can’t recommend working with our team enough, because stories are important, and I believe that if we keep telling them relentlessly, we’re sure to be heard.

If you’re interested, please contact Nancy and me at thelinemovie [at] gmail [dot] com, with ATTN: Trisha Low in the subject line. Provide us with a sense of your experience, your background, and why you want to help. No official requirements insisted upon apart from strong organisational ability and desire to stay current and keep delivering great content. This position provides a small stipend, but is rewarding and provides opportunities to work with activists, artists and youth. Managing editor can be located anywhere and work is estimated to be 5-7 hours a week.

All Posts Tagged ‘activism’